Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Paging GL!!

  1. #1
    HB Forum Owner gae's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 16th, 2001
    Posts
    2,552
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Exclamation

    1066 and all that: how Hollywood is giving Britain a false sense of history
    By Cahal Milmo
    05 April 2004


    The Battle of Hastings never took place and Adolf Hitler is a fictional character. Robin Hood really existed, Harold Wilson saved Britain during the Second World War and Conan the Barbarian is a bona fide figure from early Nordic history.

    It might sound like the latest attempt by revisionist extremists to pervert the past but the reality is perhaps more disturbing: this is how a significant chunk of the British population, muddled by Hollywood films and unmoved by academia, sees history.

    A survey of the historical knowledge of the average adult, to be published this week, has uncovered "absurd and depressing" areas of ignorance about past events, and confusion between characters from films and historical figures.

    Researchers, who conducted face-to-face interviews with more than 2,000 people, found that almost a third of the population thinks the Cold War was not real and 6 per cent believeThe War of the Worlds, H G Wells's fictional account of a Martian invasion, did happen.

    Some 57 per cent think King Arthur existed and 5 per cent accept that Conan the Barbarian, the warrior played by Arnold Schwarzenegger in a 1982 film, used to stalk the planet for real. Almost one in two believe William Wallace, the 13th-century Scottish resistance leader played by Mel Gibson in his film Braveheart, was invented for the silver screen.

    The study raised new questions about the teaching of history after it found that 11 per cent of the British population believed Hitler did not exist and 9 per cent said Winston Churchill was fictional. A further 33 per cent believed Mussolini was not a real historical figure.

    Lord Janner of Braunstone, the chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said: "Such findings show that in our schools we are not conveying sufficiently the recent past - a past in which many of us lived and so many people died.

    "If we are to prevent the return of Hitlerism in our present or future, we have to know what happened in the lifetimes of so many of us.

    "It is a terrible indictment of the level of knowledge of the general population."

    The detractors of the survey's findings blamed Hollywood and television, which have gained a reputation for skewing historical events to fit audience profiles and lift profit margins.

    The film U-571, starring Harvey Keitel and Jon Bon Jovi, sparked fury in Britain four years ago when it told how American servicemen altered the course of the Second World War by capturing the Enigma code machine from a German U-boat. In fact, it was British and Canadian sailors who captured the machine in May 1941, before the US had entered the war.

    The survey of 2,069 adults aged 16 or over was conducted for Blenheim Palace to mark the 300th anniversary of the Battle of Blenheim.

    Some 27 per cent of people interviewed thought Robin Hood, whose story has been featured in films by directors such as Kevin Costner and Mel Brooks, existed whereas 42 per cent believed Mel Gibson's Braveheart was an invention. More than 60 thought the Battle of Helms Deep in the Lord of the Rings trilogy actually took place.

    Michael Wood, the historian, said the "dumbing-down" trend was damaging people's knowledge of the past.

    He said: "If you don't give an audience a clear idea of how we know things, I believe this is a problem. Hollywood distorts history the whole time and once you get that far down the line it's not history, it's entertainment.

    "History is there to give value to the present as well as to entertain. You do diminish it if you take the mickey out of it in an attempt to make it 'accessible'."

    More than a quarter of people do not know in which century the Great War took place and 57 per cent believe that the Battle of the Bulge, the Nazi counter-offensive in the Ardennes in 1945, never happened.

    A further 53 per cent think the military leader who lead British troops at Waterloo was Lord Nelson whereas a quarter think the admiral's fatal triumph at the Battle of Trafalgar did not take place. Nearly one in five believe Harold Wilson, not Winston Churchill, was Prime Minister during the Second World War.

    John Hoy, the chief executive of Blenheim Palace, said history had become boring. He said: "People associate history with dry and dusty dates and facts. Once they realise that history is about people, the way we used to live and the way we live now, it becomes more relevant and more exciting."

    Others pointed to the popularity of history programmes. Francis Robinson, the senior vice principal of Royal Holloway, University of London, said the delivery of history to a wider audience was a worthy goal.

    He said: "I have no problem with using different media to get across the message to different sections of the audience. There is always a chance of misrepresentation, but you have to weigh up that against the broader good of encouraging more people's interest."

    But Andrew Roberts, the right-wing historian, said: "We have abandoned the teaching of history according to dates and context - if you don't know that the Tudors came before the Stuarts then you can't understand anything of that period.

    "Within a generation we are going to lose our national memory and for Britain, which has such a unique and complex history, that is a complete tragedy."

    Sstranger than fiction: Disraeli, Hitler and the Cold War

    Real people that some believe never existed
    Ethelred the Unready King of England 978 to 1016 - 63 per cent
    William Wallace 13th-century Scottish hero - 42 per cent
    Benjamin Disraeli Prime minister and founder of the modern Tory party - 40 per cent
    Genghis Khan, Mongol conqueror - 38 per cent
    Benito Mussolini, Fascist dictator, 33 per cent
    Adolf Hitler - 11 per cent
    Winston Churchill - 9 per cent

    Real events some people believe never took place
    Battle of the Bulge 52 per cent
    Battle of Little Big Horn Scene of Custer's last stand - 48 per cent
    Hundred Years' War 44 per cent
    Cold War - 32 per cent
    Battle of Hastings, 15 per cent

    Fictional characters who we believe were real
    King Arthur , mythical monarch of the Round Table - 57 per cent
    Robin Hood - 27 per cent
    Conan the Barbarian - 5 per cent
    Richard Sharpe , fictional cad and warrior - 3 per cent
    Edmund Blackadder - 1 per cent
    Xena Warrior Princess - 1 per cent

    Fictional events that we believe did take place
    War of the Worlds , Martian invasion - 6 per cent
    Battle of Helms Deep , Rings Trilogy - The Two Towers - 3 per cent
    Battle of Endor , The Return of the Jedi - 2 per cent
    Planet of the Apes , the apes rule Earth - 1 per cent
    Battlestar Galactica , the defeat of humanity by cyborgs - 1 per cent
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

  2. #2
    Emperor Napoleon
    Guest Emperor Napoleon's Avatar

    Post

    Sad.

  3. #3
    HB Forum Owner gae's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 16th, 2001
    Posts
    2,552
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I thought so, too. Leave it to the Brits to get history wrong.

    Everybody knows that King Arthur is the guy who took the Blarney Stone to Ireland right after St. Patrick planted all the shamrocks so the snakes had a good home. [img]wink.gif[/img]

  4. #4
    Emperor Napoleon
    Guest Emperor Napoleon's Avatar

    Post

    All joking aside the main reason I started writing screenplays in 1997 was in the hope of having a Napoleon movie written/produced by this year, as 2004 is the 200th anniversary of his coronation. As far as perversion of history goes, Napoleon is one of history's most maligned and misunderstood figures ever. As he himself said "Clearly I am no angel" but he was also not the anti-Christ his enemies would have history believe him to have been. He was more modern than any leader in Europe, he attempted to establish the gains of the French Revolution (promotion by merit rather than birth) while at the same time preserving traditions of the ancien regime. Every move he made created enemies, the other thrones of Europe were terrified of him lest his ideas of equalite and liberte spread to their worn down, trodden masses. He had a treacherous family who betrayed him, he was surrounded by devious and treacherous men only in it for themselves who were afraid to stand up to him and give him sound advice. Talleyrand and Fouche should have been shot by the same firing squad even though Talleyrand is another of my favorites simply because he was so perfectly devious. In the end Napoleon lost and as he stated himself, "history is written by the winner". He ended his days in exile and the British (sorry Sean) made an unprecedented campaign to sully his name and blacken his deeds. He saved France from anarchy, he tried to liberate the rest of Europe from feudalistic ideas of oppresion. His dream of a united Europe has finally come to fruition in the EU of today (almost). If anyone would like to know of a really great book I suggest "The Emperor's Last Island" by Julia Blackburn. It was what turned a mere interest into an obsession for me.

    <font color="#000002" size="1">[ April 06, 2004 09:05 AM: Message edited by: G L ]</font>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •